>ratios and angles being separate from dimorphism.
If you are a "rater" and you do this please just LDAR
the reason one man looks dimorphic and another is not is mostly down to ratios if you do not realise this you have committed the shallow causality fallacy. bigonial-bizygomatic, chin to philtrum, eye height-width i could probably keeps going on for 25+ ratios. but you would rather just arbitrarily increase one your favourites rating. same with angularity that's literally just how normies rate shit
tldr ratios and dimrophism are not seperate and you're probably a conman/retarded if you do this
If you are a "rater" and you do this please just LDAR
the reason one man looks dimorphic and another is not is mostly down to ratios if you do not realise this you have committed the shallow causality fallacy. bigonial-bizygomatic, chin to philtrum, eye height-width i could probably keeps going on for 25+ ratios. but you would rather just arbitrarily increase one your favourites rating. same with angularity that's literally just how normies rate shit
tldr ratios and dimrophism are not seperate and you're probably a conman/retarded if you do this
