[Circadex]

Tell me, how can an ideology that's goal is to improve the quality of life for people bad? Eugenics (When the means are good) is a undeniable good. I don't care about your moral Olympics, why the fuck can people with down syndrome have kids?.
it is absolutely ridiculous to let these people reproduce, their off spring are more likely to be non contributing mindless vegetables. Anyone with hereditary conditions that are a net-negative on society, or cause discomfort with the person, shouldn't be allowed to reproduce. This also applies to the overwhelmingly weak and stupid. And obviously, those with positive genetic factors should be encouraged to reproduce with similar people via social programs.
What method to i propose to stop the reproduction? sterilisation. All though, if a person is born and doesn't present symptoms (Yet has the genetic risk factor that warrants unfortunate off spring) they should be finically persuaded to have no kids/have less. And also, my own personal prejudice says: "All normies should be killed, and only based ND chads allowed to have kids" but that's just, well based, but not futile.

And if you disagree i ask you, if you had the option to edit the genetics of your child to insure they're smart, healthy & attractive, would you choose for that? or would you risk them becoming a iqlet schizo. You'd obviously choose the first, this is non negotiable. And if you "disagree" you're just virtue signalling or heavily retarded.

 

[Circadex]

Let me know what you guys think; VOTE..

 

[Tallcel]

Dnr but agree

 

[Tallcel]

I gotta postmax

 

[Tallcel]

3 posts left to stop being gray

 

[Circadex]

3 posts left to stop being gray

NIGGA NOT ON MY THREAD

 

[Circadex]

Biomaxx Tag some ppl please , i can't remember these niggas names and im quite curious to what people think about this.

 

[Dexter]

i don't see anything wrong with it

 

[Ldar]

tot

Tell me, how can an ideology that's goal is to improve the quality of life for people bad? Eugenics (When the means are good) is a undeniable good. I don't care about your moral Olympics, why the fuck can people with down syndrome have kids?.
it is absolutely ridiculous to let these people reproduce, their off spring are more likely to be non contributing mindless vegetables. Anyone with hereditary conditions that are a net-negative on society, or cause discomfort with the person, shouldn't be allowed to reproduce. This also applies to the overwhelmingly weak and stupid. And obviously, those with positive genetic factors should be encouraged to reproduce with similar people via social programs.
What method to i propose to stop the reproduction? sterilisation. All though, if a person is born and doesn't present symptoms (Yet has the genetic risk factor that warrants unfortunate off spring) they should be finically persuaded to have no kids/have less. And also, my own personal prejudice says: "All normies should be killed, and only based ND chads allowed to have kids" but that's just, well based, but not futile.

And if you disagree i ask you, if you had the option to edit the genetics of your child to insure they're smart, healthy & attractive, would you choose for that? or would you risk them becoming a iqlet schizo. You'd obviously choose the first, this is non negotiable. And if you "disagree" you're just virtue signalling or heavily retarded.

totally agree, eugenics is our future and can save fucking humanity

 

[senox]

The whole discussion just shows how deeply looks and genetics shape people's lives, whether we like it or not. Society pretends everyone is equal, but outcomes clearly aren't. I totally agree with your take we don’t need more people who contribute nothing to society at all and sterilizing those who are a net-negative could help us evolve faster without taking care of people who are nothing more than excess trash needed to be taken care of 24/7. I don’t understand why people would disagree if they want their children to be living among a bunch of vegetables and lowering our average iq so much that evolving as a society becomes impossible they should really work on their attitude towards life.

 

[Circadex]

The whole discussion just shows how deeply looks and genetics shape people's lives, whether we like it or not. Society pretends everyone is equal, but outcomes clearly aren't. I totally agree with your take we don’t need more people who contribute nothing to society at all and sterilizing those who are a net-negative could help us evolve faster without taking care of people who are nothing more than excess trash needed to be taken care of 24/7. I don’t understand why people would disagree if they want their children to be living among a bunch of vegetables and lowering our average iq so much that evolving as a society becomes impossible they should really work on their attitude towards life.

Trvke.

 

[Circadex]

bump

 

[Biomaxx]

Biomaxx Tag some ppl please , i can't remember these niggas names and im quite curious to what people think

Bigonialmanlet 9Dino 1ncel futurechad

 

[futurechad]

Based take

 

[1ncel]

Tell me, how can an ideology that's goal is to improve the quality of life for people bad? Eugenics (When the means are good) is a undeniable good. I don't care about your moral Olympics, why the fuck can people with down syndrome have kids?.
it is absolutely ridiculous to let these people reproduce, their off spring are more likely to be non contributing mindless vegetables. Anyone with hereditary conditions that are a net-negative on society, or cause discomfort with the person, shouldn't be allowed to reproduce. This also applies to the overwhelmingly weak and stupid. And obviously, those with positive genetic factors should be encouraged to reproduce with similar people via social programs.
What method to i propose to stop the reproduction? sterilisation. All though, if a person is born and doesn't present symptoms (Yet has the genetic risk factor that warrants unfortunate off spring) they should be finically persuaded to have no kids/have less. And also, my own personal prejudice says: "All normies should be killed, and only based ND chads allowed to have kids" but that's just, well based, but not futile.

And if you disagree i ask you, if you had the option to edit the genetics of your child to insure they're smart, healthy & attractive, would you choose for that? or would you risk them becoming a iqlet schizo. You'd obviously choose the first, this is non negotiable. And if you "disagree" you're just virtue signalling or heavily retarded.

Can't agree more

 

[Circadex]

Bigonialmanlet 9Dino 1ncel futurechad

Thanks brah

 

[Biomaxx]

Thanks brah

Np

 

[Circadex]

oof i would've posted this without "poll" if I'd known it would take me off homepage

 

[Circadex]

oof i would've posted this without "poll" if I'd known it would take me off homepage

What? nvm. Seems it does put me on homepage, but i could of sworn earlier it didn't. Weird..

 

[1ncel]

What? nvm. Seems it does put me on homepage, but i could of sworn earlier it didn't. Weird..

Either way tuff thread and VERY relatable

 

[9Dino]

You do understand people with down syndrome can have kids without it right?!

Eugenics is not based it's basically a fairytale cope

 

[Circadex]

You do understand people with down syndrome can have kids without it right?!

Eugenics is not based it's basically a fairytale cope

Keyword: "Likely"

(Also vote no if you're gonna disagree ffs)

 

[genecell782]

Harsh, but i agree

 

[Circadex]

Harsh, but i agree

Rep me bro

 

[sunsetupallnight]

Anybody who finds themself here can probably agree that not all men are created equal. Some traits can be objectively deemed 'inferior' by a majority of people. A lot of superior traits coorelate with each other. These differences ARE real, the question is if and how we should select for them. I personally believe the government should soft select for them through programs incentivizing achievement and supporting voluntary sterilization. The only problem is that a government with such authority can be hard to control and can very easily step beyond whst can be justified.