Should i start my height cycle without arimidex (1 Viewer)

[kashmirmaxxing]

I got my cjc dac + ipa 3 months worth. I didnt buy arimidex at the time cuz i was broke as fuck

I bought that shi but it seems i got scammed or it would take a long time to ship over to nz

should i js start or nah

 

[VelocityAnt¹]

Damn bro I'm sorry

Get on hgh bhai they genuinely have close price.

 

[kashmirmaxxing]

Damn bro I'm sorry

Get on hgh bhai they genuinely have close price.

I was gonna hop on hgh after my cycle of cjc but even then i lowk would still need an ai

 

[futureslayer51]

I got my cjc dac + ipa 3 months worth. I didnt buy arimidex at the time cuz i was broke as fuck

I bought that shi but it seems i got scammed or it would take a long time to ship over to nz

should i js start or nah

Cjc +ipa for height

 

[Judenbänker]

Aromasin (exemestane) is far better than arimidex because the latter destroys your bmd you can get it cheap on dragonordnance.com

 

[Zagro]

Aromasin (exemestane) is far better than arimidex because the latter destroys your bmd you can get it cheap on dragonordnance.com

50% suppression of e2, its shit

 

[Hide]

Its already over

 

[Judenbänker]

50% suppression of e2, its shit

me when I lie and Im a retard

 

[Zagro]

me when I lie and Im a retard

Hilarious bro, i love how you’re so confident and a moron at the same time. You’re looking at studies on postmenopausal women, it doesn’t work the same for men, you probably don’t even read studies just spam GPT am i right?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14671195/

“Maximal estradiol suppression of 62 +/- 14% was observed at 12 h”

 

[Judenbänker]

“Maximal estradiol suppression of 62 +/- 14% was observed at 12 h”

>Claims 50%
>looks up a study
>has to settle for 60+
youre hilarious ptl where did I ever even claim exemestane is as potent in men as in women? Im aware men dont get that 90% suppression but neither is this the case with anastrozole Id rather get exems 62% max and keep my bmd healthy than get 50% by anast and fuck up my bones in the meanwhile

even if you compare both post 10d those ~10% anast advantage id gladly trade for bmd health and anyone should do so imo

You’re looking at studies on postmenopausal women

I didnt look at any studies when I said that I didnt even cite any what are you on about? 50% is just not right

you probably don’t even read studies just spam GPT am i right?

totally

 

[Zagro]

>Claims 50%
>looks up a study
>has to settle for 60+
youre hilarious ptl where did I ever even claim exemestane is as potent in men as in women? Im aware men dont get that 90% suppression but neither is this the case with anastrozole Id rather get exems 62% max and keep my bmd healthy than get 50% by anast and fuck up my bones in the meanwhile

even if you compare both post 10d those ~10% anast advantage id gladly trade for bmd health and anyone should do so imo


I didnt look at any studies when I said that I didnt even cite any what are you on about? 50% is just not right


totally

Do you know what “62 +/- 14%” means

It means that it ranges from 48%-76% per individual. Do you even know why it’s considered BMD healthy compared to other aromatase inhibitors? It’s because of how weak it is in what it should do, weaker=safer.

What a weird fucker please don’t speak ever again

 

[Judenbänker]

Do you know what “62 +/- 14%” means

It means that it ranges from 48%-76% per individual.

Which is not 50% in average but exactly the named 62 lmao you cant compare with using minimum ptl might be retarded

Do you even know why it’s considered BMD healthy compared to other aromatase inhibitors? It’s because of how weak it is in what it should do, weaker=safer.

LMAO you're actually retarded as fuck its safer because its a steroidical ai and the metabolite connects to the ar which gives androgenic effects that counteract the bone resorption happening due to low estrogen not because its weak

What a weird fucker please don’t speak ever again

 

[Zagro]

Which is not 50% in average but exactly the named 62 lmao you cant compare with using minimum ptl might be retarded

Learn the basics lol giving an exact number is an impossible thing but you still need to give an average response which lies between 50-60%, no one is getting 76% genetic responses exist and the average joe has a higher chance at 50% than 60%+. You have a long way to go and are still cocky thats funny

LMAO you're actually retarded as fuck its safer because its a steroidical ai and the metabolite connects to the ar which gives androgenic effects that counteract the bone resorption happening due to low estrogen not because its weak

The primary factor is the lower E2 suppression, what you said barely matters if the overall supression is 50% rather than 80-90% others get on letrozole for example.

You need to learn more about significance rather than the processes/mechanisms

You can have a worse effect on BMD with exemestane if you tolerate the drug better

 

[Judenbänker]

Learn the basics lol giving an exact number is an impossible thing but you still need to give an average response which lies between 50-60%, no one is getting 76% genetic responses exist and the average joe has a higher chance at 50% than 60%+. You have a long way to go and are still cocky thats funny

trying to come up with the craziest reasons right there
you just fucked up you cannot use 50% when the study clearly showed 60+ as average it also makes no sense to say "oh but the average guy will get 50" the study wasnt just chads with maximum genetic response retard it was average people and the average effect was 62 basta

The primary factor is the lower E2 suppression, what you said barely matters if the overall supression is 50% rather than 80-90% others get on letrozole for example.

No it just isnt the cause for better bmd health is the steoridical effect and noone was talking about letrozole this was about exem v anast and the difference in effect between those is so small that the androgenic stimulation is what matters for bmd

you think anyone will take you srsly with your "you got much to learn" shit?

 

[Vampyr]

cjc dac + ipa for height ??

 

[Zagro]

trying to come up with the craziest reasons right there
you just fucked up you cannot use 50% when the study clearly showed 60+ as average it also makes no sense to say "oh but the average guy will get 50" the study wasnt just chads with maximum genetic response retard it was average people and the average effect was 62 basta

No it just isnt the cause for better bmd health is the steoridical effect and noone was talking about letrozole this was about exem v anast and the difference in effect between those is so small that the androgenic stimulation is what matters for bmd

you think anyone will take you srsly with your "you got much to learn" shit?

You don’t understand shit lol you do know that one study isn’t enough right, and giving an answer is also impossible its like saying everyone will reach 2000ng serum test on 250mg.

And yes the average guy cant tolerate it well enough above 60%+ thats why the 50-60% average is given.

You also apparently don’t understand how endochondral ossification or just overall heightmaxxing works if you still endorse using a weak ass aromatse inhibitor jfl

BMD or overall bone health is significantly regulated by E2, the more you lower circulating E2 the more it gets raped, your metabolite argument barely matters.

“Exemestane suppressed plasma estradiol comparably with either dose [25 mg, 38% (P <or= 0.002); 50 mg, 32% (P <or= 0.008)]”

Interesting innit,

 

[purple]

I got my cjc dac + ipa 3 months worth. I didnt buy arimidex at the time cuz i was broke as fuck

I bought that shi but it seems i got scammed or it would take a long time to ship over to nz

should i js start or nah

anything but hgh bro

 

[kashmirmaxxing]

anything but hgh bro

my nigga i was retarded when i ordered, ima use hgh after my cjc cycle