Ofc. It's too engraved to change within our lifetime. My point is it's just cultural not genetic
never once said it was literal genetic superiority, you are trying to prove a point I already comprehended
What i said is that for our lifetime, or the most of it, these standards will remain until 3rd world countries will develop.
Yes it is true that colonialism had a major impact on these said countries and the overall idea of beauty but for now, the standards are directed towards white features. like I already said.
This also goes for IQ which is a heated topic regarding Africa.
Many brainlets think that because african countries have low average IQ (tested by lynn & becker which proved later to be flawed)
that it is a major sign in superior racial genetics.
Whereas it is actually an education problem where Africa, obviously lacks education infrastructures and other factors
tru but will it reverse centuries of advertisement and media that taught people that eurocentric features are the base of beauty ?
don't think so atleast for some decades
Maybe it will change for the next generation to come, but for ours this view of attractiveness is tied to whites, in other words, jbw (as retarded as it may sound)
is in effect during our lifetime. Thus the ideas affecting us are based around jbw (yes this too sounds retarded)
My point is that I never disproved the idea of ethnics becoming the beauty standard, (it's even beginning in my country) what I said it that we would not be able to witness it in our lifetime.