megamaxxer
Future is not looking good for them
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2026
- Posts
- 257
- Reputation
- 142
i think turks r brown fuck but armenians looks whites
what u think
what u think
i am armenian and i am whiteNah none of them are white
What do you mean by white tho? Just skin color?i am armenian and i am white
What do you mean by white tho? Just skin color?
Both niggersi think turks r brown fuck but armenians looks whites
what u think
no i am armenian and not a niggerBoth niggers
neither but most turks and armenians are closer to being white than browni think turks r brown fuck but armenians looks whites
what u think
turks r brown fucks meanwhile armenians are superior then whitesneither but most turks and armenians are closer to being white than brown
No not all turks are Brown lmaoturks r brown fucks meanwhile armenians are superior then whites
yeah some turks are brown but i have seen plenty white turks its not really a yes or no questionturks r brown fucks meanwhile armenians are superior then whites
north africans are more white then turksNo not all turks are Brown lmao
only the greek onesyeah some turks are brown but i have seen plenty white turks its not really a yes or no question
Most turks I have seen are White coloredyeah some turks are brown but i have seen plenty white turks its not really a yes or no question
im armenian tooturks r brown fucks meanwhile armenians are superior then whites
ahh good , bulagrians are gypsy mfs taking over armeniaim armenian too
bulgarians are so dirty everytime i walked past one they smelled like sweatahh good , bulagrians are gypsy mfs taking over armenia
they r short and stocky and brownbulgarians are so dirty everytime i walked past one they smelled like sweat
and ugly as fuck their faces look like nuclear powerplantsthey r short and stocky and brown
they look like pakisand ugly as fuck their faces look like nuclear powerplants
imbreded muttsthey look like pakis
worse then pakisthey look like pakis
atleast bulagrians don't blast xaxaxaworse then pakis
atleast pakis dont pickpocket every living thing they see. well they sometimes still do that but not as much as gypsisatleast bulagrians don't blast xaxaxa
yes mfs are with knifes on sofia airportatleast pakis dont pickpocket every living thing they see. well they sometimes still do that but not as much as gypsis
they dont need a knife. their stench is enough to defeat their victimsyes mfs are with knifes on sofia airport
This is absurd. The average Greek and average Turk have the same average skin tone.only the greek ones
armenians are middle eastern while turks are a mix of white+middle eastern+gooki think turks r brown fuck but armenians looks whites
what u think
they are closer to brown especially armenians who have no white dna at all.neither but most turks and armenians are closer to being white than brown
Armenians are actually more on the white sidethey are closer to brown especially armenians who have no white dna at all.
they are middle eastern.Armenians are actually more on the white side
Yes but in terms of skin color i meantthey are middle eastern.View attachment 43115
Turks are either middle eastern, Turkic (central Asian) or Eastern European I wouldn’t consider us white (im half Turkish from dads side)i think turks r brown fuck but armenians looks whites
what u think
There's no such thing as "white DNA". The term "white" itself is a loaded meaningless term.they are closer to brown especially armenians who have no white dna at all.

Except Turks are very genetically close to Armenians.armenians are middle eastern while turks are a mix of white+middle eastern+gook
are you that brown shitskinned chimp from com @AngryBuu96? same retarded takes+chatgptThere's no such thing as "white DNA". The term "white" itself is a loaded meaningless term.
Armenians and Turks are *Western Eurasian*, but genetics are clinal. The biggest predictor of genetics is geography. Turkey is next to Greece, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Iraq, Syria and Cyprus? Then the structure of Turks will resemble these groups.
And unfortunately for you:
"The genetic structure of the Turkish population reveals high levels of variation and admixture" by Kars et al
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8433500/
"We delineated the fine-scale genetic structure of the Turkish population by using sequencing data of 3,362 unrelated Turkish individuals from different geographical origins and demonstrated the position of Turkey in terms of human migration and genetic drift. The results show that the genetic structure of present-day Anatolia was shaped by historical and modern-day migrations, high levels of admixture, and inbreeding. We observed that modern-day Turkey has close genetic relationships with the neighboring Balkan and Caucasus populations. We generated a Turkish Variome which defines the extent of variation observed in Turkey, listed homozygous loss-of-function variants and clinically relevant variants in the cohort, and generated an imputation panel for future genome-wide association studies."
"The construction of population-based variomes has contributed substantially to our understanding of the genetic basis of human inherited disease. Here, we investigated the genetic structure of Turkey from 3,362 unrelated subjects whose whole exomes (n = 2,589) or whole genomes (n = 773) were sequenced to generate a Turkish (TR) Variome that should serve to facilitate disease gene discovery in Turkey. Consistent with the history of present-day Turkey as a crossroads between Europe and Asia, we found extensive admixture between Balkan, Caucasus, Middle Eastern, and European populations with a closer genetic relationship of the TR population to Europeans than hitherto appreciated."
"The geographical origins of ancestors (birthplaces of maternal and paternal grandparents) of 1,460 TR samples were documented and grouped into six different subregions, namely Balkan (TR-B: 90), West (TR-W: 157), Central (TR-C: 441), North (TR-N: 372), South (TR-S: 116), and East (TR-E: 284) (13). First, we performed a principal component (PC) analysis (PCA) using only TR individuals of known origin (SI Appendix, Fig. S3). There were no sharp divisions between TR subregions, yet the position of subregions along PC axes was similar to their geographical location. To evaluate the impact of geography in shaping the genomic variability in Turkey, we tested the correlation between geographic and genetic coordinates by applying a Procrustes analysis. Consistent with the results of the PCA, we did not observe a clear-cut distribution of samples among TR subregions, although we did detect a significant mild positive correlation in our dataset (Fig. 1A, correlation in Procrustes rotation, 0.49 P < 1 × 10−5)."
Also Greeks share more alleles with Turks and Armenians than "Northern Europeans" (duh).
Are Greeks "non-white" or do you invoke stupidity only for groups "you like"? Greeks are far closer to Turks than Estonians or Swedes are to Finns yet people like you insist the differences between Finns and Swedes/Estonians are negligible and the differences between Turks and Greeks are notable.![]()
europe and middle east are complete different regions with different culture, population, history and geography. Populations are different, whites originated from yamnaya+anf+whg, while ahmeds descended from anf+neolithic iranians+chg+levantine natufian hunter gathers. so we are not the same at all you shitskinned ethnic.Except Turks are very genetically close to Armenians.
"White" and "Middle Eastern" aren't meaningful terms. The "Middle East" is a British created term, "Europe" too is an ill-defined, goalpost term and genetics are clinal. There's no convergent evolution between peoples who share a WESTERN EURASIAN BASE. "Western Eurasian" is a stronger, more scientifically tenable term than either "European" or "Middle Eastern".
You look middle eastern bro. I mean I guess most of them are white passing


