Discussion are the negroes even human? (1 Viewer)

[dookiebootybutt59]

im infamous on lookist forums, lol
View attachment 21845
i was top 50 on org for reps and posts

can anyone actually read this

 

[Godveil Heir]

im infamous on lookist forums, lol

Node's Bitch?
that account is also banned from what I recall

and old picture of got daimn written won't do
you could've planned it before

@/data/avatars/s/28/28216.jpg?1768492012 J350 You have 5 minutes
A video of you handwriting "J350 on .gg" on paper and your arm exposed, or simply saying it out loud with your face visible .

or ban

these 2
or foid

 

[J350]

gave you the option of saying it out loud incase you wanna larp estradiol taker femboy

https://vocaroo.com/1lq7bfXqCxL9

 

[Mirilow]

DNR + go rapes yourself since thats the only way you can ever feel sex you incel

 

[imlovewthecoco]

https://vocaroo.com/1lq7bfXqCxL9

u are the saddest most depressing person ive ever seen in my entire life, how can u be gay and racist bro, the same guys that hates him hates u too. U are 28 yo and still is in incels forums, just grow up. U are a disgrace

 

[J350]

Node's Bitch?
that account is also banned from what I recall

and old picture of got daimn written won't do
you could've planned it before


these 2
or foid

You might be the dumbest user I have had the displeasure of encountering

 

[oldfag]

if you want to be taken seriously don't refer to them as negroes and instead use SSA. i think you know this.
i will say despite the shit you're getting, sepehr makes a very convincing argument regarding this topic.

i don't know why you would use SSAs as the primary example for subspecies/species differentiation, though. again, i think you know this and just want to be provocative. the best example you could give would be australian aboriginals.

 

[Mirilow]

You might be the dumbest user I have had the displeasure of encountering

View attachment 21851

Your black urself jfl

 

[nzifoidfucker]

I cannot help but ask myself the extent to which they (negroids and Caucasoids) truly constitute a part of the same species. genetic analyses have discerned a striking degree of endogamy within both racial groups, with allelic diversity exceeding that observed amongst certain avian, reptilian, and piscean taxonomies [1]. this genetic isolation, archaic hominid ancestry, begs the question: are we still warranted in appending the moniker 'homo sapiens' to all of humanity with such disparate lineage?

fuerle's work [2][3], imbued with a rigorously scientific methodology and an unflinching commitment to the truth, forces us to confront the possibility that the negro may represent a distinct, albeit closely related, species. the notion, once taboo, of affording the negro a unique taxonomic designation, emerges as a plausible hypothesis that merits further scholarly scrutiny.

by examining the negro through the lens of modern genetics, anatomy, and evolutionary theory, we find ourselves compelled to revisit the very definition of our species. the persistence of racial disparities, rooted in our deep evolutionary past, challenges us to reevaluate the boundaries of what it means to be human.

references
[1] Shriver MD, Kennedy GC, Parra EJ, Lawson HA, Sonpar V, Huang J, Akey JM, Jones KW. The genomic distribution of population substructure in four populations using 8,525 autosomal SNPs. Hum Genomics. 2004 May;1(4):274-86. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-1-4-274. PMID: 15588487; PMCID: PMC3525267.
[2] Fuerle, R. D. (2008). Erectus walks amongst us: The evolution of modern humans. Spooner Press. ISBN 978-1-60458-121-8.
[3]Hu, Meng. 2025. “Erectus Walks Amongst Us: A Book Arguing That Africans Are a Different Species…” July 13, 2025.

Niggers are not humanwhite power

 

[Judenbänker]

 

[J350]

View attachment 21867

good luck trying to replicate something as politically incorrect as this with AI

here is one of my diplomas

 

[nzifoidfucker]

good luck trying to replicate something as politically incorrect as this with AI
View attachment 21934
here is one of my diplomas

What does it say

 

[6zrir6a]

Dnr

 

[Circadex]

View attachment 21823

Based
depends
depends
based
depends

 

[J350]

What does it say

bachelors degree in molecular biology and i have some other degrees

 

[bonebaby]

I cannot help but ask myself the extent to which they (negroids and Caucasoids) truly constitute a part of the same species. genetic analyses have discerned a striking degree of endogamy within both racial groups, with allelic diversity exceeding that observed amongst certain avian, reptilian, and piscean taxonomies [1]. this genetic isolation, archaic hominid ancestry, begs the question: are we still warranted in appending the moniker 'homo sapiens' to all of humanity with such disparate lineage?

fuerle's work [2][3], imbued with a rigorously scientific methodology and an unflinching commitment to the truth, forces us to confront the possibility that the negro may represent a distinct, albeit closely related, species. the notion, once taboo, of affording the negro a unique taxonomic designation, emerges as a plausible hypothesis that merits further scholarly scrutiny.

by examining the negro through the lens of modern genetics, anatomy, and evolutionary theory, we find ourselves compelled to revisit the very definition of our species. the persistence of racial disparities, rooted in our deep evolutionary past, challenges us to reevaluate the boundaries of what it means to be human.

references
[1] Shriver MD, Kennedy GC, Parra EJ, Lawson HA, Sonpar V, Huang J, Akey JM, Jones KW. The genomic distribution of population substructure in four populations using 8,525 autosomal SNPs. Hum Genomics. 2004 May;1(4):274-86. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-1-4-274. PMID: 15588487; PMCID: PMC3525267.
[2] Fuerle, R. D. (2008). Erectus walks amongst us: The evolution of modern humans. Spooner Press. ISBN 978-1-60458-121-8.
[3]Hu, Meng. 2025. “Erectus Walks Amongst Us: A Book Arguing That Africans Are a Different Species…” July 13, 2025.

Gosh you actual ignoramus you think Africans are a different species. It’s a same there there are dogs and many breeds iq frauding cunt

 

[phagcel]

your argument is a specious one, predicated upon a false equivalence and a superficial focus on trivial phenotypical similarities.

to dismiss the genuine, well-documented biological differences as mere "bigotry" is to engage in the very same kind of ideologically driven denial that has long obstructed a clear-eyed understanding of race. the fact that both groups exhibit unique, genetically determined traits is not a matter of opinion, but a matter of empirical fact, supported by a vast and growing body of scientific evidence.

your attempted counterargument, comparing white people to monkeys based on superficial physical characteristics, is a logical fallacy known as "tu quoque".

Spoiler: explanation

it seeks to deflect attention from the well-established biological differences between the races by pointing to minor resemblances to other species. this specious reasoning is akin to arguing that since lions and cats share some physical characteristics, they are essentially the same creature. it is a transparent attempt to obfuscate the profound and meaningful genetic and anthropological differences that distinguish the negro from the caucasoid.

rather than engaging in such intellectually dishonest comparisons, it would be well-served to examine the peer-reviewed literature on human genetic diversity, anthropometry, and evolutionary biology. denial, in the face of overwhelming evidence, is faggotry.

here I have provided a small segment of references from my overall work on this topic from the last 10 years.

dnr your chatgpt psuedo studies + replacement theory goes brrrrr

 

[TheAlphaMale]

I cannot help but ask myself the extent to which they (negroids and Caucasoids) truly constitute a part of the same species. genetic analyses have discerned a striking degree of endogamy within both racial groups, with allelic diversity exceeding that observed amongst certain avian, reptilian, and piscean taxonomies [1]. this genetic isolation, archaic hominid ancestry, begs the question: are we still warranted in appending the moniker 'homo sapiens' to all of humanity with such disparate lineage?

fuerle's work [2][3], imbued with a rigorously scientific methodology and an unflinching commitment to the truth, forces us to confront the possibility that the negro may represent a distinct, albeit closely related, species. the notion, once taboo, of affording the negro a unique taxonomic designation, emerges as a plausible hypothesis that merits further scholarly scrutiny.

by examining the negro through the lens of modern genetics, anatomy, and evolutionary theory, we find ourselves compelled to revisit the very definition of our species. the persistence of racial disparities, rooted in our deep evolutionary past, challenges us to reevaluate the boundaries of what it means to be human.

references
[1] Shriver MD, Kennedy GC, Parra EJ, Lawson HA, Sonpar V, Huang J, Akey JM, Jones KW. The genomic distribution of population substructure in four populations using 8,525 autosomal SNPs. Hum Genomics. 2004 May;1(4):274-86. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-1-4-274. PMID: 15588487; PMCID: PMC3525267.
[2] Fuerle, R. D. (2008). Erectus walks amongst us: The evolution of modern humans. Spooner Press. ISBN 978-1-60458-121-8.
[3]Hu, Meng. 2025. “Erectus Walks Amongst Us: A Book Arguing That Africans Are a Different Species…” July 13, 2025.

Its the same thing as dog breeds its like comparing a pug to a husky

 

[J350]

Gosh you actual ignoramus you think Africans are a different species. It’s a same there there are dogs and many breeds iq frauding cunt

dnr your chatgpt psuedo studies + replacement theory goes brrrrr

Its the same thing as dog breeds its like comparing a pug to a husky

I already addressed all of this

here is my bachelors in molecular biology

 

[birthdefect]

I cannot help but ask myself the extent to which they (negroids and Caucasoids) truly constitute a part of the same species. genetic analyses have discerned a striking degree of endogamy within both racial groups, with allelic diversity exceeding that observed amongst certain avian, reptilian, and piscean taxonomies [1]. this genetic isolation, archaic hominid ancestry, begs the question: are we still warranted in appending the moniker 'homo sapiens' to all of humanity with such disparate lineage?

fuerle's work [2][3], imbued with a rigorously scientific methodology and an unflinching commitment to the truth, forces us to confront the possibility that the negro may represent a distinct, albeit closely related, species. the notion, once taboo, of affording the negro a unique taxonomic designation, emerges as a plausible hypothesis that merits further scholarly scrutiny.

by examining the negro through the lens of modern genetics, anatomy, and evolutionary theory, we find ourselves compelled to revisit the very definition of our species. the persistence of racial disparities, rooted in our deep evolutionary past, challenges us to reevaluate the boundaries of what it means to be human.

references
[1] Shriver MD, Kennedy GC, Parra EJ, Lawson HA, Sonpar V, Huang J, Akey JM, Jones KW. The genomic distribution of population substructure in four populations using 8,525 autosomal SNPs. Hum Genomics. 2004 May;1(4):274-86. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-1-4-274. PMID: 15588487; PMCID: PMC3525267.
[2] Fuerle, R. D. (2008). Erectus walks amongst us: The evolution of modern humans. Spooner Press. ISBN 978-1-60458-121-8.
[3]Hu, Meng. 2025. “Erectus Walks Amongst Us: A Book Arguing That Africans Are a Different Species…” July 13, 2025.

dnr the ugliest worst race of "people" are the abos

 

[bonebaby]

i wasnt replying to you, idiot
also i showed you my diploma

?
i am a homosexual

How his meat taste

im infamous on lookist forums, lol
View attachment 21845
i was top 50 on org for reps and posts

pushing thirty bro put that much time into a job or lose all that fat

 

[YoooRichard]

I cannot help but ask myself the extent to which they (negroids and Caucasoids) truly constitute a part of the same species. genetic analyses have discerned a striking degree of endogamy within both racial groups, with allelic diversity exceeding that observed amongst certain avian, reptilian, and piscean taxonomies [1]. this genetic isolation, archaic hominid ancestry, begs the question: are we still warranted in appending the moniker 'homo sapiens' to all of humanity with such disparate lineage?

fuerle's work [2][3], imbued with a rigorously scientific methodology and an unflinching commitment to the truth, forces us to confront the possibility that the negro may represent a distinct, albeit closely related, species. the notion, once taboo, of affording the negro a unique taxonomic designation, emerges as a plausible hypothesis that merits further scholarly scrutiny.

by examining the negro through the lens of modern genetics, anatomy, and evolutionary theory, we find ourselves compelled to revisit the very definition of our species. the persistence of racial disparities, rooted in our deep evolutionary past, challenges us to reevaluate the boundaries of what it means to be human.

references
[1] Shriver MD, Kennedy GC, Parra EJ, Lawson HA, Sonpar V, Huang J, Akey JM, Jones KW. The genomic distribution of population substructure in four populations using 8,525 autosomal SNPs. Hum Genomics. 2004 May;1(4):274-86. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-1-4-274. PMID: 15588487; PMCID: PMC3525267.
[2] Fuerle, R. D. (2008). Erectus walks amongst us: The evolution of modern humans. Spooner Press. ISBN 978-1-60458-121-8.
[3]Hu, Meng. 2025. “Erectus Walks Amongst Us: A Book Arguing That Africans Are a Different Species…” July 13, 2025.

As a negro, idrc that you don’t like us, but this amount of hatred is lowkey cringe gng, like imagine spending your time writing all this up cuz a black man probably cucked you. Don’t bring up the violence argument tho either because white people have the highest percentage of csam crimes etc. i would rather be a murderer than a pedophile

 

[bonebaby]

As a negro, idrc that you don’t like us, but this amount of hatred is lowkey cringe gng, like imagine spending your time writing all this up cuz a black man probably cucked you. Don’t bring up the violence argument tho either because white people have the highest percentage of csam crimes etc. i would rather be a murderer than a pedophile

His husband prob was watching dreamybull or something