[gaygymmax]

Yes admin confirmed

ill spam his tags Master

 

[Machiavellian]

if he reads it might not be over

hes barely even active on org tho

he doesn't care

 

[Steve Rogers]

he is a NEET that alone makes him fit so well for mod

Administrator high iq move

he said one time that he has a full time job

 

[gaygymmax]

he said one time that he has a full time job

no way there were niggas at his house and he just drives to work

 

[Steve Rogers]

Machiavellian if i make another q&a for ggm will u delete it?

 

[Machiavellian]

he said one time that he has a full time job

customer support or what

 

[gaygymmax]

Machiavellian if i make another q&a for ggm will u delete it?

you should stop doing that

 

[Machiavellian]

you should stop doing that

his faggotry can't resist

 

[Steve Rogers]

you should stop doing that

whats wrong with making q&as for people, its been my org tradition for months since my second alt account

 

[gaygymmax]

whats wrong with making q&as for people, its been my org tradition for months since my second alt account

because we arent actually answering questions its slop and bait

 

[Steve Rogers]

because we arent actually answering questions its slop and bait

cope, one time one of my q&as got a few pages of users asking randomized shame questions

 

[Machiavellian]

cope, one time one of my q&as got a few pages of users asking randomized shame questions

did u do one for master?

 

[Steve Rogers]

Machiavellian how about a q&a megathread so you can ask anyone, so i dont have to keep spamming offtopic to ask people questions

 

[Steve Rogers]

did u do one for master?

i actually did, he dnrd it though

 

[Godveil Heir]

if he reads it might not be over

hes barely even active on org tho

He's not gonna do shit

 

[Steve Rogers]

i actually did, he dnrd it though

fuck you Master

 

[Machiavellian]

Machiavellian how about a q&a megathread so you can ask anyone, so i dont have to keep spamming offtopic to ask people questions

worse

 

[Steve Rogers]

worse

how?

 

[Machiavellian]

i actually did, he dnrd it though

ask him if he is dietmaxxing or what

 

[Steve Rogers]

• Replies: 67 who fucking ruined it

 

[Steve Rogers]

It all began with @TechnoBoss banning people and deleting threads for making "unban kaligula" threads...

Nothing wrong with that, "posting on behalf of a banned user" is a punishable offense...

however, Mr. Boss took it one step too far....
View attachment 13792
(like with the last thread, the most pressing evidence comes last View attachment 13771 im edging you innit)

EXHIBIT A: THREATENING TO DOX KALIGULA
Spoiler: Exhibit A
OCTOBER 11th 2024
Kaligula and Technoboss seemed to engage in some sort of argument and seemed to hold animosity towards each other
Here technoboss implies he will "get completely fucked" if he does something
View attachment 13780
MA_ascender asks how...
View attachment 13776
Technoboss directly implies that he will retaliate through some means which make use of Kaligula's location View attachment 13772
but then... he backtracks View attachment 13773
View attachment 13782
I was not looking to include this at first.. but you may notice that i am screen shotting MA_ascenders replys to technoboss instead of technoboss's messages himself...
That's because technoboss knew he fucked up and later deleted his own messages to cover it up View attachment 13774
IS THERE A PRECEDENT TO BAN HIM FOR THIS ALONE?
Yes:

@NarrowBoneMarrow was PERMABANNED for threatening to post my face,
@Arzenic was demodded in part due to also threatening to dox @chadisbeingmade IF he could aquire information
this is different. It is WORSE than posting someone's face and he ALREADY acquired the necessary information
The legal precedent IS THERE, but I will inevitably need more than this to win over the Jew mods, and it is old... View attachment 13779

EXHIBIT B: PERSECUTION OF @kababcel
Spoiler: Exhibit B
Kababcel DID indeed post on behalf of banned users, and this thread in particular was reasonable to delete:
View attachment 13783

However, Kababcel then protested, claiming he was not enlisted by kaligula/proex and made the thread on his own accord.
He first made a thread titled: "WE ARE SLOWLY LOSING FREE SPEECH"
regardless of whether or not this was a "good thread", protest is allowed, and this post was obviously NOT on behalf of banned users, but on behalf of HIMSELF
the thread was DELETED
He then made this thread exposing Technoboss for mod abuse
View attachment 13797
Any guesses what happened next?
Yep. this thread was DELETED as well, IMMEDIATELY.
View attachment 13785
Now I couldn't snag a screen shot of "WE ARE SLOWLY LOSING FREE SPEECH" before it was deleted. but as said by Kababcel, gengar was actively in that thread, and literally said it wouldn't get deleted
Gengar KNOWS IT WOULDN'T BE JUSTIFIED View attachment 13784
but the following thread is RIGHT THERE. AND ITS NOT ON BEHALF OF ANY BANNED USERS! YOU CAN'T SCRUB THAT ONE TECNO View attachment 13786 View attachment 13787
banned.
View attachment 13788

EXHIBIT C: PERSECUTION OF sasageyo
Spoiler: Exhibit C
sasageyo then made a similar thread, it was NOT a thread on behalf of any user
He said he responded to the situation once before, and the thread was deleted:
View attachment 13796
Then, this message right here was deleted as well View attachment 13791
Here we can see sasageyo DID NOT BREAK ANY RULES. and simply protested technoboss's behavior and mod abuse
banned.
View attachment 13794

It is clear from these examples that @TechnoBoss CAN and WILL ban people that he doesn't like, OR individuals who call him out for mod abuse.
Calling out mod abuse IS ALLOWED
How else could I have adopted the persona of gaygoodman?
View attachment 13798

Additionally, lets consider who's hes banning...

individuals who posted on behalf of kaligula...

kaligula,
whom he called a "douchebag"
whom he said he had the location of, when responding to somebody asking "what would you do to him"

hes banning individuals who associate with THAT person... a bit biased no? however, bias isn't even required to seal this case. these are clearly unjustified bans REGARDLESS.


(now ONCE AGAIN, they did post on his behalf, but that is NOT why they are banned as shown above)

Furthermore, after posting THE ABOVE THREAD, technoboss permanantly banned me without reasonable cause, and numbthepain put all of the mods on a gag order, all of them will like my dms, read them, but never respond. The jewish cabal runs deep, move to gg.

Machiavellian

CurlyDihHair help him out with being unbanned

 

[Machiavellian]

Master​

Iron
Joined Aug 9, 2025
Last seen 4 minutes ago · Viewing thread Gaygymmax's manifesto

 

[Steve Rogers]

gaygymmax you made it in life
Master is viewing ts thread
Machiavellian Godveil Heir

 

[Godveil Heir]

gaygymmax you made it in life
Master is viewing ts thread
Machiavellian Godveil Heir

He's just gonna ignore lol
He views complaints but takes no action

 

[idk]

It all began with @TechnoBoss banning people and deleting threads for making "unban kaligula" threads...

Nothing wrong with that, "posting on behalf of a banned user" is a punishable offense...

however, Mr. Boss took it one step too far....
View attachment 13792
(like with the last thread, the most pressing evidence comes last View attachment 13771 im edging you innit)

EXHIBIT A: THREATENING TO DOX KALIGULA
Spoiler: Exhibit A
OCTOBER 11th 2024
Kaligula and Technoboss seemed to engage in some sort of argument and seemed to hold animosity towards each other
Here technoboss implies he will "get completely fucked" if he does something
View attachment 13780
MA_ascender asks how...
View attachment 13776
Technoboss directly implies that he will retaliate through some means which make use of Kaligula's location View attachment 13772
but then... he backtracks View attachment 13773
View attachment 13782
I was not looking to include this at first.. but you may notice that i am screen shotting MA_ascenders replys to technoboss instead of technoboss's messages himself...
That's because technoboss knew he fucked up and later deleted his own messages to cover it up View attachment 13774
IS THERE A PRECEDENT TO BAN HIM FOR THIS ALONE?
Yes:

@NarrowBoneMarrow was PERMABANNED for threatening to post my face,
@Arzenic was demodded in part due to also threatening to dox @chadisbeingmade IF he could aquire information
this is different. It is WORSE than posting someone's face and he ALREADY acquired the necessary information
The legal precedent IS THERE, but I will inevitably need more than this to win over the Jew mods, and it is old... View attachment 13779

EXHIBIT B: PERSECUTION OF @kababcel
Spoiler: Exhibit B
Kababcel DID indeed post on behalf of banned users, and this thread in particular was reasonable to delete:
View attachment 13783

However, Kababcel then protested, claiming he was not enlisted by kaligula/proex and made the thread on his own accord.
He first made a thread titled: "WE ARE SLOWLY LOSING FREE SPEECH"
regardless of whether or not this was a "good thread", protest is allowed, and this post was obviously NOT on behalf of banned users, but on behalf of HIMSELF
the thread was DELETED
He then made this thread exposing Technoboss for mod abuse
View attachment 13797
Any guesses what happened next?
Yep. this thread was DELETED as well, IMMEDIATELY.
View attachment 13785
Now I couldn't snag a screen shot of "WE ARE SLOWLY LOSING FREE SPEECH" before it was deleted. but as said by Kababcel, gengar was actively in that thread, and literally said it wouldn't get deleted
Gengar KNOWS IT WOULDN'T BE JUSTIFIED View attachment 13784
but the following thread is RIGHT THERE. AND ITS NOT ON BEHALF OF ANY BANNED USERS! YOU CAN'T SCRUB THAT ONE TECNO View attachment 13786 View attachment 13787
banned.
View attachment 13788

EXHIBIT C: PERSECUTION OF sasageyo
Spoiler: Exhibit C
sasageyo then made a similar thread, it was NOT a thread on behalf of any user
He said he responded to the situation once before, and the thread was deleted:
View attachment 13796
Then, this message right here was deleted as well View attachment 13791
Here we can see sasageyo DID NOT BREAK ANY RULES. and simply protested technoboss's behavior and mod abuse
banned.
View attachment 13794

It is clear from these examples that @TechnoBoss CAN and WILL ban people that he doesn't like, OR individuals who call him out for mod abuse.
Calling out mod abuse IS ALLOWED
How else could I have adopted the persona of gaygoodman?
View attachment 13798

Additionally, lets consider who's hes banning...

individuals who posted on behalf of kaligula...

kaligula,
whom he called a "douchebag"
whom he said he had the location of, when responding to somebody asking "what would you do to him"

hes banning individuals who associate with THAT person... a bit biased no? however, bias isn't even required to seal this case. these are clearly unjustified bans REGARDLESS.


(now ONCE AGAIN, they did post on his behalf, but that is NOT why they are banned as shown above)

Furthermore, after posting THE ABOVE THREAD, technoboss permanantly banned me without reasonable cause, and numbthepain put all of the mods on a gag order, all of them will like my dms, read them, but never respond. The jewish cabal runs deep, move to gg.

Machiavellian

Yeah all the good users are banned