He is chill but he just needs to be weary of how he is perceived by other people, idk why he accused out of the blue either or engaged after he said he'll do it tomorrow, bit strange but he's a good user
Not sure tbh
Probally is as people are getting taller
Its because of food.
not in the us
Hypergamy helped us unforunatly
I personally live in london and all my classmates are really tall and the people i see outside are pretty tall if i had to guess i'd say the average is 6ft.
Yes and no
avg in us Is 5'9
Yes at 99%
Not sure bro
I responded bcs netts chill and he told me I'm a bum
No, just because people are taller that doesnt neccesarily mean better atleast from a moral standing.
You're still having a category fallacy. The fact that its expression is socially mediated doesn't make it any less evolutionary in nature. Evolutionary forces shape the preference, and culture is merely exeggeratung, twisting, and presenting it. This is not analogous to the preference suddenly becoming "non-evolutionary."
nettspend
CameronDarkTriadmax
And women still wonder why we despise themSimilar to my other thread but way more focused on the evolution and biological aspect.
Everyone loves to hide behind biology to justify hypergamy- specifically heightism. You can claim girls have sought more masculine, taller, stronger, and dominant men since the dawn of time, but that fucking entirely ignores how actual evolutionary stages work.
For example, the stone age, height was an actual function utility for survival, hence why women seeked for a tall man during such times. But now in 2026, it just resembles a luxury status symbol. Times have changed and we moved from "survival of the fittest" to "optimization of the elite" and it has done irreversible damage to the dating market.
The actual reality is that hypergamy has hijacked these inherited biologic traits and turned them into a smash or flop binary, since survival is no longer a factor in modern day society, these instincts have been weaponized as clout markers.
A girl being with a guy for his height isn't even about survival or protection anymore, its about the status they have for being with them in a world full of infinite options. We've allowed girls to develop a unrealistic and primitive preference to be inflated by a dating market where men offer a surplus of free attention, making the baseline for the average guy completely unrealistic.
And it goes further than that, the double standard is the actual proof, for example If a guy uses evolution to justify being attracted to younger women for fertility he's called a pedo or a creep. but if a girl uses evolution to justify heightism or demanding a top 1% provider its just "biological" only one side is allowed to use biology as a shield to move the goal posts.
We are being outcasted by stone age standards that have no functionalities or utility on modern day society. And its just going to continue being an endless loop that goes downhill because we keep subsidizing these standards with desperate validation.
The requirement will only get more unrealistic as time goes on, and the percentages will drop. We've already seen the most unrealistic jump in this generation, from when it use to be "oh he just has to be taller than me" to "oh he has to be at least 6 foot" and we aren't even doing anything to prevent them from changing these standards. We are letting them create these fantasies through our own past mistakes of giving too much attention making them think their perceived value is more than it really is. Now we are the ones who have to suffer from the drought.
realhmtn
im ngl gang im feeling like hella lazy rn ill just let you winYou're still having a category fallacy. The fact that its expression is socially mediated doesn't make it any less evolutionary in nature. Evolutionary forces shape the preference, and culture is merely exeggeratung, twisting, and presenting it. This is not analogous to the preference suddenly becoming "non-evolutionary."
You've constructed an entire argument on the fallacy that they are mutually exclusive, while in fact, they can both be true simultaniously.
A more logical argument would be: You're confusing "distorted by the enviroment" with "therefore no longer biological." That does not follow.
The evolutionary process of "runaway selection" doesn't mean the preference suddenly ceases to be evolutionary. In fact, the exact opposite is true; the preference is still evolutionary; it's simply been exaggerated to an insane extent.
The fact that height became an evolutionary argument presupposes the argument I am giving you.
Furthermore, your "system failure" argument is not strong at all. Evolution doesn't care whether the preference is philosophically optimal for the current environment. All that matters is whether the preference still registers with women. If women still find height attractive, protective or dominant, then the preference is simply still evolutionary in mate selection, even though the original environment is no longer present.
You are also smuggling in a false criteria by judging the 6'4 guy who can't work modern systems as "evolutionarily obsolete." That is simply your own opinion. The fact is, mate choice is not strictly meritocracy based on rationality and well-roundedness. We choose based on a variety of criteria, and evolutionary psychology is not a morally equitable system.
The second part of your argument on the double standard is something I agree with you on, although you are applying it incorrectly. Society does have different views on the female and male mate preferences. Male preferences for younger partners are evolutionary-based on fertility, just like female preferences for taller men, which are based on things like strength and dominance.
The difference in male and female mate choice is not based on biology, but on social acceptance. One is "creepy," and the other is "natural," but that's just culture interfering again, not evolution. Biology does not care about your social morality. The truth is, a double standard does exist, and that does not mean that a preference for height is a hallucination.
ur retarded
that's kinda based ngl
Not rlly he’s just a fag who claims “high iq” when all he does is copy and paste old shit
yea its not really abt the high IQ part but its based to just steal threads for reps
True that’s why I added the extra part
“Edit”
Weird idk if my shits kinda bugged for now
And who are you exactly?
How ironic talking about larping high iq when all your “guides” are all water asf and copy and pasted from .org etc
MedSlayer check this guy out, looking forward to this loser's response lol.
nigga i claimed you were "high" iq beacause cheat said so he said to glaze you its from a while agoAnd who are you exactly?
Show me one guide you've posted.
After that, show me evidence of my threads being copied and pasted from org, I've written each one myself, apart from the lookism ones but that is to preserve BP history.
Most of my guides so far I've typed in 10 minutes including formatting and its all straight from the dome.
And don't make me screenshot threads from a month or two ago where you were tagging me and glazing me for "high IQ".
I'm waiting for your response. And If you ignore this message you're a fucking loser.
MedSlayer is a low iq retard cel no point in taggging him because he's genuienly retarted asf
Show me one time I claimed myself to be high IQ please.
i know more than you ever could dont compare usnigga i claimed you were "high" iq beacause cheat said so he said to glaze you its from a while ago
also even if you did write those threads there complete shit nigga
and yes i havent posted any guides (yet) i will in the future
also
dnr no evidence + cheat didn't tell you to glaze nothing, that was your decision you weirdo, how are my guides pure shit the likes on the posts speak for themselves, you have no LM knowledge.nigga i claimed you were "high" iq beacause cheat said so he said to glaze you its from a while ago
also even if you did write those threads there complete shit nigga
and yes i havent posted any guides (yet) i will in the future
also
You literally have called yourself that a trillion times
6ft1Cheat every time whenever he calls you "high iq"
evidence please your statements have no backing right now.You literally have called yourself that a trillion times
and you agree with
beacuse you are the same person
Like ive said many times which in your case you obv havent seen beacause your retarted this acc is used for retarted post obv
no I haven't seen them posts where you claimed thaat because I don't lurk the profile of a shitposter who's called "xvideosdemon"
There you go. Argument concluded, there's nothing in that head of yours, you can't even name one topic.
I can but why is me telling you gonna change anything i am making a guide but i dont want anyone else to know about it beacuse its gonna be on an alt = i dont want them knowing its me
dnr, your points make 0 sense and you've gone way off track to what we were originally discussing
im not looking back at old threads just for a LM forum arguement i have better shit to do you faggot
OH no no no what did medslayer donigga i claimed you were "high" iq beacause cheat said so he said to glaze you its from a while ago
also even if you did write those threads there complete shit nigga
and yes i havent posted any guides (yet) i will in the future
also
Dw my goat u won this argument
He's a retardOH no no no what did medslayer do
its tied lowk
it was ong bro
