not true
Being with
explain why they dont then
theyre pretty shit after puberty/in late puberty but during puberty they're good for dihmaxx + increased height velocity and dimorphism
you think dht really affects the mandible? jfl, the dihmaxx and height might be the only valid reason, besides that? just useless oil way weaker than test and that will rape ur collagen and hair.
it doesnt effect the mandible, and collagen and hair is fixable
If you think all that burden it's worthy thats just ur opinion.
dihmaxx + height are near to unfixable after puberty, so i think its worth it
Doesn't he wanna use them for bodybuilding?
oh then everything i stated is irrelevant
Synapse put jfl back on this post get rid of the ughh
Plus he wants to blast 2 grams of test as his first cycle cuz he think it will "ascend him", roids are overated for pretty much anything facially related except facial dimorphism, most of the gains people see anyways is just facial muscle hypertrophy.
bro dht binds strong to bone androgen receptors much stronger than test, thing is im trying to find smth stronger than dht itself, almost like tren is stronger than test exceopt i need a dht derivative
megadose pinning my sperm
im 15 ill block dht when im near done with puberty and barely any growth is leftDexter
dhtmaxxing meta like baby shitley said.
dimorphism as in?
yup.
i still dont understand why the dht cope for dimorphism still stands ngl.
too much social media and too little knowledge. unironically, most people here know whatever they do from tiktok.
ik, anyways, ask any girl if they like the "masculine facial dimorphism" from bodybuilders blasting grams of mast and halo, lets see if they find that appealing lmfao.
dht binds to androgen receptors directly in the mandible and there are studies showing it increases cortical thickness and plus its needed to maintain density in skeleton similar to estrogen
To be honest ill admit i dont know much about it for dimo ive mainly researched it for height, however i have heard masteron is good for dimo hence the reason i said it.
any dht derivative is gross for that purpuose, and no the collagen and hair rape even if fixable is a burden and brutal looksmin.
Read the threads, plus u prob need fillers or implants, roids are not saving most peoples faces anyways, i doubt they are saving yours, if you still want to destroy ur looks furthermore take ment.
Ill have to look into them
also i read your thread a bit and its false that your saying that there is abrely 5ar in bone, literally if that was true why is it that when ppl r on dht inhibitors they start lacking bone density, all osteoblast cells have 5ar
well its too much of a coincidence that most appositional growth that ppl r lacking in the face r given through androgens how come everybodys mandible is narrow in 2026 and is smaller than back in primal times and back then there were no endocrine disruptors
finasteride partially inhibits dht if u take smth like duasteride it affects bone mineral density.
read the study lol.
yes bro primal diet iz da key n sheet.
Both behave almost the same lmfao, none significantly impacted bmd or bone mineralization at all.}
notice how the brow ridge mandible and zygos all look diff and how the width of the skull is wider exactly what androgens do, hgh doesnt do this.
not at all dutasteride is so much stronger
the studies u claim to prove ur point completly debunk it JFL.
how retarded are u? like actually? this is just peak cherry-picking,
https://www.researchgate.net/public...nant_of_calcaneal_bone_mineral_density_in_men this is the one i read
ur idols face iq just quit the primal diet a few days ago and goatis is clinically retarded and receives state benefits, and aajounus vonderplatz had a fake diploma lol.
i dont do primal diet i agree its retarded u need glucose for proper igf1 to hgh conversion through insulin however, as i have said before the affects of the hunter skull are not achieved through hgh rather androgens since they possess androgenic like skull dimorphism.
"was barely any glucose" like glucose grows on trees JFL, the logic behind ur argument has literal nothing to do at all with each other, people didnt eat a primal diet, they ate whatever they had to survive, also Hunter-gatherers did not have "much higher testosterone" because of low glucose, they actually had a baseline t 20-33% lower than modern western man.
did u actually read it? lol, and also that study is from 2009, super outdated.
ahmed in the fucking desert has nothing but cactus's and camels to eat that nigga 100% has more dimorphism than the modern western man, u got proof they had 20-33% less test than modern western man?
