2g tren 2g test
Mark as solution
(No ai btw,)
Trust me crazy dimorphism stack i ran it a few months ago
Mark as solution
I was gonna do like 150 test 300 tren but idk yetLower test with tren is better, yes
Well yes, mechanistically and from a harm reduction stanpoint yes.Is a lower test base with high tren optimal?
150 test and 300 tren?Well yes, mechanistically and from a harm reduction stanpoint yes.
Nah do like 175 test 200 trenI was gonna do like 150 test 300 tren but idk yet
2g tren 2g test
Mark as solution
(No ai btw,)
Trust me crazy dimorphism stack i ran it a few months ago
Mark as solution
I wouldn't do 300mg of tren.150 test and 300 tren?
This sounds more reasonable, still, you need your ancillaries dialed in, as we want to mitigate as much side effects and prioritize as much harm reduction as possible.175 test 200 tren
This meaning you need a very complete ancillary stack for lipids, cardiovascular health, and neuroprotection, we can't afford to spare anything, you need those 3 mandatory.I wouldn't do 300mg of tren.
This sounds more reasonable, still, you need your ancillaries dialed in, as we want to mitigate as much side effects and prioritize as much harm reduction as possible.


