Looksmax - Men's Self Improvement Forum

Welcome to the ultimate men’s self-improvement community where like-minded individuals come together to level up every aspect of their lives. Whether it’s building confidence, improving your mindset, optimizing health, or mastering aesthetics, this is the place to become the best version of yourself. Join the hood and start your transformation today.

Discussion The new "perspective of attractiveness" (1 Viewer)

Discussion The new "perspective of attractiveness"

Synapzyzz

Tel Aviv, Israel, proud IDF Soldier!
Joined
Dec 30, 2025
Posts
862
Reputation
1,992
I better be boy or the consequences will be bad
download (60).jpg
 

Ascension

-23kg from Reta
Joined
Jan 7, 2026
Posts
810
Reputation
1,584
As my guide about the PSL scale, sparked a lot of mixed opinions about ratings systems and the flaws and inconsistencies that each one have, i wanted to ask the general opinion of the forum of what the new consensus about "ratings" and "attractiveness" be, or if there should even be such a things as "ratings" to begin with, as a 2022cel i know there are probably several more experienced and well versed users here about this topic so i would like to ask for their opinion on the subject as I'm trying to improve my guide and actually provide valuable content for this forum and a new perspective into attractiveness that isn't the same bs that we all have heard from years on and on of "he is htn shes is stacy she is this and bla bla " .
Mirin the effort
 

Synapzyzz

Tel Aviv, Israel, proud IDF Soldier!
Joined
Dec 30, 2025
Posts
862
Reputation
1,992
There is no new consensus, but as far as I can tell ive spent the past 6 years on forum's & communities involving myself within aesthetics oriented spaces, Ive found it to be that almost every rater had one small difference in formula from another rater b/c of said raters specific bias's, there is no full proof accurate method of quantifying beauty on a numerical scale because of how little our dataset of averageness is. There is 2 much information to compile to gather a unanimous answer, however this does not refute the simple yet brutal fact that their is an objective when it comes to attractiveness and we can use this orthadontic pseudoscience to establish a general outline of what beauty is. In the modern context most raters use an out of 10 scale with the formula being;

A(P)=(0.45xH)+(0.2xD)+(0.2xBF)+(0.15xM)
what would my thread need in order to be a botb candidate? to change/delete the graph used or rating method presented?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Top