Looksmax - Men's Self Improvement Forum

Welcome to the ultimate men’s self-improvement community where like-minded individuals come together to level up every aspect of their lives. Whether it’s building confidence, improving your mindset, optimizing health, or mastering aesthetics, this is the place to become the best version of yourself. Join the hood and start your transformation today.

Cope Any osteoblast promoting drug is cope (1 Viewer)

Cope Any osteoblast promoting drug is cope

HailSanta

Supersperm
Joined
Nov 30, 2025
Posts
399
Reputation
474
People who promote osteoporosis drugs are ChatGPT warriors. They know nothing about how or why osteoporosis is relevant. romosozumabs effects are dominated by endosteal modelling/remodelling, not sustained periosteal expansion. all these so called “bone mass drugs” are the same way. this is due to periosteal expansion MAINLY BEING EPIGENETIC and there being no way of specifically targeting the areas you want. no, you cannot locally inject as you would need a crazy low half life and a crazy high effect, that doesn’t even consider that periosteal cells are very slow. I could list 50 other reasons why this take makes 0 sense but this alone is enough
 

FS51

Gone till the summer
Joined
Dec 25, 2025
Posts
3,291
Reputation
8,031
People who promote osteoporosis drugs are ChatGPT warriors. They know nothing about how or why osteoporosis is relevant. romosozumabs effects are dominated by endosteal modelling/remodelling, not sustained periosteal expansion. all these so called “bone mass drugs” are the same way. this is due to periosteal expansion MAINLY BEING EPIGENETIC and there being no way of specifically targeting the areas you want. no, you cannot locally inject as you would need a crazy low half life and a crazy high effect, that doesn’t even consider that periosteal cells are very slow. I could list 50 other reasons why this take makes 0 sense but this alone is enough
People who promote osteoporosis drugs are ChatGPT warriors. They know nothing about how or why osteoporosis is relevant. romosozumabs effects are dominated by endosteal modelling/remodelling, not sustained periosteal expansion. all these so called “bone mass drugs” are the same way. this is due to periosteal expansion MAINLY BEING EPIGENETIC and there being no way of specifically targeting the areas you want. no, you cannot locally inject as you would need a crazy low half life and a crazy high effect, that doesn’t even consider that periosteal cells are very slow. I could list 50 other reasons why this take makes 0 sense but this alone is enough
first non shitpost
 

Mirin

Darktraid
Joined
Dec 24, 2025
Posts
2,667
Reputation
4,788
People who promote osteoporosis drugs are ChatGPT warriors. They know nothing about how or why osteoporosis is relevant. romosozumabs effects are dominated by endosteal modelling/remodelling, not sustained periosteal expansion. all these so called “bone mass drugs” are the same way. this is due to periosteal expansion MAINLY BEING EPIGENETIC and there being no way of specifically targeting the areas you want. no, you cannot locally inject as you would need a crazy low half life and a crazy high effect, that doesn’t even consider that periosteal cells are very slow. I could list 50 other reasons why this take makes 0 sense but this alone is enough
Good
 

HailSanta

Supersperm
Joined
Nov 30, 2025
Posts
399
Reputation
474
People who promote osteoporosis drugs are ChatGPT warriors. They know nothing about how or why osteoporosis is relevant. romosozumabs effects are dominated by endosteal modelling/remodelling, not sustained periosteal expansion. all these so called “bone mass drugs” are the same way. this is due to periosteal expansion MAINLY BEING EPIGENETIC and there being no way of specifically targeting the areas you want. no, you cannot locally inject as you would need a crazy low half life and a crazy high effect, that doesn’t even consider that periosteal cells are very slow. I could list 50 other reasons why this take makes 0 sense but this alone is enough
Biomaxx Biomaxx is there any argument?
 

Godveil Heir

Head Moderator · Evil Genius
Staff member
The Grove
Joined
Dec 11, 2025
Posts
4,219
Reputation
8,421
Based blackpilled truth

People who promote osteoporosis drugs are ChatGPT warriors. They know nothing about how or why osteoporosis is relevant. romosozumabs effects are dominated by endosteal modelling/remodelling, not sustained periosteal expansion. all these so called “bone mass drugs” are the same way. this is due to periosteal expansion MAINLY BEING EPIGENETIC and there being no way of specifically targeting the areas you want. no, you cannot locally inject as you would need a crazy low half life and a crazy high effect, that doesn’t even consider that periosteal cells are very slow. I could list 50 other reasons why this take makes 0 sense but this alone is enough
 

Biomaxx

Semper sursum
Joined
Oct 12, 2025
Posts
3,704
Reputation
8,171
Biomaxx Biomaxx is there any argargument
yes, actually. *argument

Calling periosteal expansion “untargetable” is stupid . Sclerostin inhibition influences Wnt signaling in periosteal osteoblasts, and both animal and human data show periosteal apposition over time, (especially with mechanical loading.) Treating all bone drugs as equivalent also misses distinction between antiresorptives, modeling-based anabolics, ext. which act through different mechanisms.
 
Joined
Nov 14, 2025
Posts
930
Reputation
1,307
yes, actually. *argument

Calling periosteal expansion “untargetable” is stupid . Sclerostin inhibition influences Wnt signaling in periosteal osteoblasts, and both animal and human data show periosteal apposition over time, (especially with mechanical loading.) Treating all bone drugs as equivalent also misses distinction between antiresorptives, modeling-based anabolics, ext. which act through different mechanisms.
yes daddy clock himm
 

Biomaxx

Semper sursum
Joined
Oct 12, 2025
Posts
3,704
Reputation
8,171
yes, actually. *argument

Calling periosteal expansion “untargetable” is stupid . Sclerostin inhibition influences Wnt signaling in periosteal osteoblasts, and both animal and human data show periosteal apposition over time, (especially with mechanical loading.) Treating all bone drugs as equivalent also misses distinction between antiresorptives, modeling-based anabolics, ext. which act through different mechanisms.
Can u also ping me back in an hour so I can come back when not high
 

HailSanta

Supersperm
Joined
Nov 30, 2025
Posts
399
Reputation
474
yes, actually. *argument

Calling periosteal expansion “untargetable” is stupid . Sclerostin inhibition influences Wnt signaling in periosteal osteoblasts, and both animal and human data show periosteal apposition over time, (especially with mechanical loading.) Treating all bone drugs as equivalent also misses distinction between antiresorptives, modeling-based anabolics, ext. which act through different mechanisms.
Ofc there are exceptions but am referring to the majority
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
126
Synapzyzz
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Top