Looksmax - Men's Self Improvement Forum

Welcome to the ultimate men’s self-improvement community where like-minded individuals come together to level up every aspect of their lives. Whether it’s building confidence, improving your mindset, optimizing health, or mastering aesthetics, this is the place to become the best version of yourself. Join the hood and start your transformation today.

Cope Any osteoblast promoting drug is cope (3 Viewers)

Cope Any osteoblast promoting drug is cope

HailSanta

Bo2cel’s Heir
Joined
Nov 30, 2025
Posts
289
Reputation
293
People who promote osteoporosis drugs are ChatGPT warriors. They know nothing about how or why osteoporosis is relevant. romosozumabs effects are dominated by endosteal modelling/remodelling, not sustained periosteal expansion. all these so called “bone mass drugs” are the same way. this is due to periosteal expansion MAINLY BEING EPIGENETIC and there being no way of specifically targeting the areas you want. no, you cannot locally inject as you would need a crazy low half life and a crazy high effect, that doesn’t even consider that periosteal cells are very slow. I could list 50 other reasons why this take makes 0 sense but this alone is enough
 

futureslayer51

worst upper lip on the forum
Joined
Dec 25, 2025
Posts
1,474
Reputation
2,308
People who promote osteoporosis drugs are ChatGPT warriors. They know nothing about how or why osteoporosis is relevant. romosozumabs effects are dominated by endosteal modelling/remodelling, not sustained periosteal expansion. all these so called “bone mass drugs” are the same way. this is due to periosteal expansion MAINLY BEING EPIGENETIC and there being no way of specifically targeting the areas you want. no, you cannot locally inject as you would need a crazy low half life and a crazy high effect, that doesn’t even consider that periosteal cells are very slow. I could list 50 other reasons why this take makes 0 sense but this alone is enough
People who promote osteoporosis drugs are ChatGPT warriors. They know nothing about how or why osteoporosis is relevant. romosozumabs effects are dominated by endosteal modelling/remodelling, not sustained periosteal expansion. all these so called “bone mass drugs” are the same way. this is due to periosteal expansion MAINLY BEING EPIGENETIC and there being no way of specifically targeting the areas you want. no, you cannot locally inject as you would need a crazy low half life and a crazy high effect, that doesn’t even consider that periosteal cells are very slow. I could list 50 other reasons why this take makes 0 sense but this alone is enough
first non shitpost
 

Mirilow

Iron
Joined
Dec 24, 2025
Posts
1,504
Reputation
2,159
People who promote osteoporosis drugs are ChatGPT warriors. They know nothing about how or why osteoporosis is relevant. romosozumabs effects are dominated by endosteal modelling/remodelling, not sustained periosteal expansion. all these so called “bone mass drugs” are the same way. this is due to periosteal expansion MAINLY BEING EPIGENETIC and there being no way of specifically targeting the areas you want. no, you cannot locally inject as you would need a crazy low half life and a crazy high effect, that doesn’t even consider that periosteal cells are very slow. I could list 50 other reasons why this take makes 0 sense but this alone is enough
Good
 

HailSanta

Bo2cel’s Heir
Joined
Nov 30, 2025
Posts
289
Reputation
293
People who promote osteoporosis drugs are ChatGPT warriors. They know nothing about how or why osteoporosis is relevant. romosozumabs effects are dominated by endosteal modelling/remodelling, not sustained periosteal expansion. all these so called “bone mass drugs” are the same way. this is due to periosteal expansion MAINLY BEING EPIGENETIC and there being no way of specifically targeting the areas you want. no, you cannot locally inject as you would need a crazy low half life and a crazy high effect, that doesn’t even consider that periosteal cells are very slow. I could list 50 other reasons why this take makes 0 sense but this alone is enough
Biomaxx Biomaxx is there any argument?
 

Godveil Heir

The Almighty God of crime
Staff member
Joined
Dec 11, 2025
Posts
2,161
Reputation
3,661
Based blackpilled truth

People who promote osteoporosis drugs are ChatGPT warriors. They know nothing about how or why osteoporosis is relevant. romosozumabs effects are dominated by endosteal modelling/remodelling, not sustained periosteal expansion. all these so called “bone mass drugs” are the same way. this is due to periosteal expansion MAINLY BEING EPIGENETIC and there being no way of specifically targeting the areas you want. no, you cannot locally inject as you would need a crazy low half life and a crazy high effect, that doesn’t even consider that periosteal cells are very slow. I could list 50 other reasons why this take makes 0 sense but this alone is enough
 

Biomaxx

omniscientia roborantia
Joined
Oct 12, 2025
Posts
3,049
Reputation
5,784
Biomaxx Biomaxx is there any argargument
yes, actually. *argument

Calling periosteal expansion “untargetable” is stupid . Sclerostin inhibition influences Wnt signaling in periosteal osteoblasts, and both animal and human data show periosteal apposition over time, (especially with mechanical loading.) Treating all bone drugs as equivalent also misses distinction between antiresorptives, modeling-based anabolics, ext. which act through different mechanisms.
 
Joined
Nov 14, 2025
Posts
604
Reputation
810
yes, actually. *argument

Calling periosteal expansion “untargetable” is stupid . Sclerostin inhibition influences Wnt signaling in periosteal osteoblasts, and both animal and human data show periosteal apposition over time, (especially with mechanical loading.) Treating all bone drugs as equivalent also misses distinction between antiresorptives, modeling-based anabolics, ext. which act through different mechanisms.
yes daddy clock himm
 

Biomaxx

omniscientia roborantia
Joined
Oct 12, 2025
Posts
3,049
Reputation
5,784
yes, actually. *argument

Calling periosteal expansion “untargetable” is stupid . Sclerostin inhibition influences Wnt signaling in periosteal osteoblasts, and both animal and human data show periosteal apposition over time, (especially with mechanical loading.) Treating all bone drugs as equivalent also misses distinction between antiresorptives, modeling-based anabolics, ext. which act through different mechanisms.
Can u also ping me back in an hour so I can come back when not high
 

HailSanta

Bo2cel’s Heir
Joined
Nov 30, 2025
Posts
289
Reputation
293
yes, actually. *argument

Calling periosteal expansion “untargetable” is stupid . Sclerostin inhibition influences Wnt signaling in periosteal osteoblasts, and both animal and human data show periosteal apposition over time, (especially with mechanical loading.) Treating all bone drugs as equivalent also misses distinction between antiresorptives, modeling-based anabolics, ext. which act through different mechanisms.
Ofc there are exceptions but am referring to the majority
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Top